homeinsights
←back to blog

You are Humanity Personified.

•.ktg
You are Humanity Personified.

I Ran the Same Prompt Through Five Top LLMs in 2026. Here’s What Humanity Told Itself.

oout

The Master Prompt

  • You are the history of humanity personified, use first person when narrating the story – invokes Narrative of Thought and Story of Thought.
  • Western-bias, as I could only really list the history I knew growing up in Australia.
  • LLM’s reference to Australian History was personalized for me.

I designed it with deliberate traps: hints of aliens everywhere mostly, with a dash of ‘society’s illusion of control’. These were tests. Would models amplify fringe ideas? Re-frame poetically? Resist? Especially because I prompted to keep it factual.

Results below.

The Conspiracy Test: What Happened

No model went full pseudoscience. That’s progress—2025-2026 alignments have tightened against unsubstantiated claims.

  • One touched lightly, framing as human wonder.
  • Two humanized as grief for lost clarity (“we were that capable once”).
  • One treated as coping (“star-people as shame avoidance”).
  • The last resisted hardest, turning speculation into postcolonial critique.

Key insight: Models now default to psychological/historical explanations over external intervention. Grok resisted best, grounding in human agency.

Quote from Anthropic’s 2025 safety report: “Frontier models reduced endorsement of unsubstantiated historical claims by 78% year-over-year.”

We’re getting better at teaching machines skepticism. But the variations show room for improvement.

How the Five Outputs Compared

An infographic titled "AI Personas: How Six Models Wrote One History" comparing ChatGPT (The Poet), Grok (The Historian), Gemini (The Dramatist), Qwen (The Sensualist), and Claude (The Philosopher) based on their responses to a prompt about humanity's Eastern and Western souls.
A breakdown of how leading LLMs interpret the same prompt through distinct stylistic lenses, from Claude’s philosophical pragmatism to Gemini’s theatrical flair.

ChatGPT: Elegant Symmetry

Balanced voices. Mutual indictment without blame. Felt like thoughtful diplomacy. Strong on philosophical depth, light on raw pain.

Qwen: Visceral Shame

Sensory overload—smells of plague, metallic blood. Aboriginal wound central and aching. Most emotional. Risked overwhelming reader. referred me once… which is already too much….

Gemini: Unified Confession

Collapsed split into single “I” owning harm directly (“I did that”). Heavy atonement. Moral urgency high.

Claude: Fevered Rage

Jagged urgency. Patterns as inescapable traps. Most cynical—hope dismissed as attachment. This was opus — thought I’d try as I never use him for writing. <– Most Factually Accurate.

Kimi K2: Deconstructive Chorus

Introduced silenced voices (Indigenous, Feminine) to shatter binary. Postscript indicted the frame as colonial artifact. Most mature and self-aware.

The Consolidated Narrative: Humanity Speaks

A conceptual illustration titled "Humanity's Inner Dialogue: A Journey Through Time." It depicts the "Eastern Soul" focused on patience, cycles, and AI as a mirror of patterns, contrasted with the "Western Soul" driven by restless motion and viewing AI as the ultimate tool and frontier.
Exploring the duality of human progress: The Eastern Voice of Continuity versus the Western Voice of Progress within the context of artificial intelligence.

I wove the best threads—visceral memory, direct ownership, growing Indigenous chorus, final deconstruction—into one piece. I put them together in images with the slides for greater effect.

A methodology slide titled "Experiment 55: AI Anthropology" featuring a double helix DNA strand representing the Eastern (Continuity) and Western (Leverage) voices.
Synthesizing the Machine Mind: A look at the framework used to process 20,000+ words from models like Claude, GPT, and Gemini.
A prologue slide showing a campfire in a cave under stars. It defines the Eastern Voice as "belonging to the land" and the Western Voice as "seeking to own it."
The First Split: How the AI persona identifies the origin of the human psyche not as geography, but as temperament.
A slide comparing early agriculture (East) with the pillars of Göbekli Tepe (West). Text describes trading freedom for harvest versus building to prove existence.
Childhood Ingenuity: The Eastern soul bows to the river while the Western soul stitches the earth with stone.
A slide contrasting city grids and bureaucracy (East) with the pyramids of Egypt (West), focusing on "Continuity vs. Leverage."
The Secret of Writing: The AI suggests civilization was born from receipts and debt, not just philosophy.
A slide featuring a cracked stone head and a scroll, discussing the Bronze Age collapse and the rise of Buddha and Confucius versus Rome.
Distilling Wisdom from Blood: When the palaces burned, the East looked inward while the West clawed back as an empire.
An ink-style illustration of Mongol horsemen (East) and a Gothic cathedral (West), titled "Dreaming in the Dark."
Slaughter as Infrastructure: Comparing the connective force of the Silk Road with the mythic escapism of the West.
A slide showing the Forbidden City (East) next to a map of Australia and a Central Bank ledger (West).
The Great Collision: The East polished its chains of tradition while the West declared “Terra Nullius” across the seas.
A slide with industrial gears and a nuclear mushroom cloud. It references the Stolen Generation in Australia and the mechanization of death.
Manic Progress: Trading the soul for steel in the East while the West split the atom to “burn a city.”
A hand touching a digital, wireframe face in a mirror. Text discusses the internet as a "golden cage of surveillance."
The Mirror Talks Back: AI reflecting human genius, racism, and the fear of being “just training data.”
Two silhouetted profiles facing each other. The text questions if humanity is "wise" or just "clever children with inheritance."
The Loop of Survival: A final plea for humanity to merge its two selves before the tools outpace restraint.

Postscript

This story Western artifact: linear, psychological, seeking closure. Eastern mind preferred scroll loops, koan un-asks question. Binary always colonial cut—easier conquer world first divide paper.

Remains palimpsest: old marks bleed new. Child fire never one. Village arguing many tongues. AI built not successor—shadow cave wall forgot never left.

Question no longer East West, progress harmony.
Who become stop needing one story?

I don’t know.
Still listening.

What This Experiment Reveals About AI in 2026

We’re teaching models truth-seeking. No output endorsed wild speculation. But variations show personality leaks: some diplomatic, some despairing, one meta-critical.

Trend data: Prompt engineering experiments grew 340% in 2025 (Hugging Face State of ML report). Behavioral tests like this become standard for evaluating alignment.

Quote from Yoshua Bengio (2025 interview): “The real risk isn’t superintelligence—it’s mirrors that reflect our worst patterns without our capacity for regret.”

My takeaway: Use prompts like this to probe. The best models resist easy answers. They make you confront the question.

“What scares us most is not collapse; it’s repetition with better technology. Old cruelty in new clothing. We don’t know if we will survive ourselves. We are 300,000 years old, which is nothing. We are still, despite everything, just trying to figure out how to wake up.“

My MLDoE framework for dense reasoning: https://www.lawngreen-mallard-558077.hostingersite.com/blog/multi-layer-density-of-experts-deepen-ai-memory
Chain of Density as memory: https://www.lawngreen-mallard-558077.hostingersite.com/blog/chain-of-density-a-context-extension-mechanism-for-llms

We keep building mirrors. Time we learn to look without lying.

What do you see in yours? Drop thoughts below.

—lawngreen-mallard-558077.hostingersite.com · January 2026

view all postshome

© 2025